Wednesday 15 August 2007

Jake wants to get the power back in his hands again?

Hot on the heels of Sporty Jake, we now have the promising prospect of Jake Gyllenhaal back on the stage - move over Broadway Joe, Broadway Jake is back! According to today's New York Post the play Farragut North has been taken from off-Broadway Second Stage Theatre and director James Lapine and is now in the hands of well-known stage and screen director Mike Nichols, who is all set to put the political drama on Broadway, during the Presidential campaigns of Autumn/Fall 2008, and with Jake Gyllenhaal at the helm.



This all sounds perfect but who can say at this stage whether Jake's role in this will come to fruition? - sources are few and far between and Chinese Whispers are doing their thing across the world wide web so that now it sounds as if Jake is already having costume fittings. It also makes one wonder the reason for the shift in theatre and director - with Jake on board, Broadway seems more apposite for his debut on the US stage and the whole affair becomes that bit more irresistible.


I hope you will forgive me but I got wrapped up in West End Jake yesterday evening for the post on This is Our Youth and I did some more furtling around. This is partly because there is something so appealing about the thought of London Jake, especially for me who spends so much of her time in this fine town. And now, this Jake seems closer as the prospect tantalises of Jake on another stage, in another great city. Jake received superlative reviews for his performance in This is Our Youth - one can only imagine how his presence and talent will dominate a stage now, after five years of honing his craft.


Here is one such review of the London play: 'This Is Our Youth is a wonderful discovery. Three talented young stars of the future, all of whom have already made some high profile films, give up their time to appear onstage in London, visiting the basics of their craft. For one, Jake Gyllenhaal (Warren), this is his stage debut, all the more hard to believe as he gives such an accomplished and secure performance... Tousled haired Jake Gyllenhaal is immensely likeable as he conveys Warren's tendency for a rather naïve honesty. He can only tell the truth in response to Jessica's question, "Do you want to mess around or do you want to have a serious discussion?" Gyllenhaal gives Warren all the fidgetting mannerisms of gauche youth. It is Warren who becomes more assured in the course of the play, when he is able to bite back at Dennis' put downs.'


Jake was also interviewed for the Telegraph when he was in London. I particularly like this interview just for the little glimpse it affords of Jake walking the same streets (Notting Hill in this case) that I visit every working day: 'In his spare time, he has seen several theatre matinees, and explored Notting Hill and Hampstead Heath on foot - an odd sensation for an LA native: "It's weird, using your legs for anything but pushing a gas pedal."' The photos below show Jake in London in 2003 - I believe that is Kirsten's bag in the first picture(!), taken in Notting Hill.




What is especially interesting about this interview is that in it Jake tells us why he decided to take to the stage and this may well indicate his reasons for wanted to do Farragut North next year - that's if he does, of course. This is Our Youth followed a quick succession of movies for Jake and it is possible that he views Brokeback Mountain, Jarhead, Zodiac and Rendition as another quick moving conveyor belt of film production and film publicity and he wants to step off, take a breath, before getting back on for the next block. We must hope though, that there could be one more film (at least!) between Rendition and this pause for breath.


'One reason he wanted to work in the theatre is his over-exposure to Hollywood. "There's a kind of monotone drone about life there," he reflects. "You do one film, then you're up for another." He says he has learned to see through the hyperbolic flattery that is the currency of industry conversations. And he needed a change of pace. "I did five films last year," he says, looking bemused. "It was fine, except the power is not in your hands in terms of how your performance is shaped. To be able to have some sort of say over a story was really the big thing that made me want to try theatre."'


Before I leave this interview, there is a little comment at the end, which made me feel for Jake. He is discussing The Good Girl and his co-star Jennifer Aniston: "She's great in it, and this will allow people to see Jennifer in a new way," he says. "And yes, we make out in the film. That wasn't hard at all, except for an uncomfortable, awkward sex scene." He sighs. "I don't know if it looks that way on screen." Jake then goes on to say how lucky he has been: "These days, a lot of children are forced into growing up quickly. For me, it could easily have been something else. I don't think I'll look back on my youth with too many regrets."


Final thoughts

Now briefly back to Mike Nichols and his Broadway Venture. It also looks like Nichols will be bringing another great actor to the stage, Morgan Freeman, who may star in The Country Girl. His wife may be played by Frances McDormand, whom I recall was also caught up in the Christmas fire at Manka's Inverness Lodge along with the Gyllenhaal family. Another link is that I believe Mike Nichols is married to Diane Sawyer who came over a little peculiar and light headed when she interviewed Jake as part of the Zodiac promotion in the Spring. She mentioned that Jake's SNL performance had had quite an effect on her - didn't she say that she fell out of bed? Mike Nichols may well have had a practical demonstration of the appeal of his potential leading man.


Includes pictures from IHJ.

33 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hey WDW..stellar posting, as usual!! My only regret about Jake on Broadway is that I do not live in the Big Apple, so I shall never see the production. If it ever comes to my city, it is for sure that Jakey will not be part of it...SIGH!! I am sure he will be wonderful in it...Michele

Wet Dark and Wild said...

Hey Michele - good to hear from you - hope you're having a good week. If Jake does this, he'll do himself proud.

Anonymous said...

Michele, maybe we can start a collection or hire a plane - well, why not?

Seems to me that many directors would love to work with Jake - Ang really took off on Jake's beauty -
gosh! - Richard Kelly said Jake would "do anything" - and yeah, imagine pillow talk between Mike WHOM I ADORE - and Diane- "honey, this boy will do ANYTHING. . . "

Imagine the fun in directing Jake who played with the graduated Benjamin (Dustin) in Moonlight Mile - Mike having directed Dustin, at about the same age, a few years older.

Imagine - I think there's a song by that name. :) :) :)

Wet Dark and Wild said...

Hey Positively pia - good to see you :D I agree that directors are after working with Jake and that's why I wonder if this whole change of plot for the play is because of a director-actor 'thing'. Who wouldn't want to surround themselves in Jake's beauty? Interesting whatever. oh yes, can I book a ticket for that plane?!

Cherita said...

I believe that is Kirsten's bag in the first picture(!)

Of course. Go look through IHJ, in fact, and you'll see several more examples. This is the sign I know I will see when Jake is truly in love again. He will be photographed carrying a handbag. If only it were mine!

Yet another brilliant post, WDW. I knew I could count on you to give me some new-to-me goods on This Is Our Youth.

I don't know if I have personal possessions of enough combined value to make the trip (and buy the ticket!) to see this production, but if it's confirmed, I'm going to do my damnedest.

Anonymous said...

Gosh, I really hate to be nitpicky and all, but

and is now in the hands of well-known stage and screen director Mike Nichols, who is all set to put the political drama on Broadway, during the Presidential campaigns of Autumn/Fall 2008, and with Jake Gyllenhaal at the helm.

"At the helm" means to be directing or driving, which Jake is not.

Furthermore, we don't even know if Jake is going to star in it. Mike Nichols might have his own ideas of who he'd like to see in the lead role.

Personally I'd like to think that his wife falling out of bed, presumably with her husband next to her ON the bed, during Jake's appearance on SNL might have something to do with Mike Nichols wanting to direct Farragut North with Jake attached to it. But who knows. Directors are known to be an odd lot.

I'm still awaiting word from Jake's camp on all this.

Wet Dark and Wild said...

Hi Cherita - I do love those pictures of Jake with Kirsten :D Whenever I can, I always like someone else to carry my bags, so I'm with Kirsten on this one.

Hi Cyn - I must say that in my post I stress that I have no idea about whether Jake will do this role and also that Chinese Whispers have been pushing this story around the web making it sound like truth, even though - and my post also says this - that there is only one source. This is what I say: This all sounds perfect but who can say at this stage whether Jake's role in this will come to fruition? - sources are few and far between and Chinese Whispers are doing their thing across the world wide web so that now it sounds as if Jake is already having costume fittings.

I really am very little bothered about the 'helm' business - thats all your's! I'm afraid that writing and researching these posts at the end of very long days means I can choose a word open to debate. My tired brain chose 'helm' as describing a 'leading man'. As you say, you are very nitpicky! I would like to stress again that I said that there is no more evidence than before that Jake will do this but I like the thought.

Anonymous said...

"at the helm" Rich Kelly said to Jake, "it was on your shoulders" (re: Donnie Darko). Jake said in a faux femme voice, "thank you, Richard." (chanelling WHO - whom?)

Jake fussed about his lack of input re: Zodiac.

Relations between Director and Actor fascinate me.

Does sn actor have more "power" on stage than in film?

Wet Dark and Wild said...

Positively Pia - relations between actors and directors fascinate me a great deal too, and I've been interested by the number of times that Jake and Maggie have referred to their working relationship with their directors - sometimes for good, sometimes not so good. And it's true that some directors do put their actor at the helm - Richard Kelly and Sam Mendes being two examples.

When I read this interview, I did think about your question myself. Is it true that in a play an actor is placed more firmly at the helm and given some freedom. And I concluded that maybe they do, after all the performance is not a one off, it's over a long period of time and development must take place and dialogue will take place between the actor and his director. The actor will start to realise that some interpretations don't fit with his view of his character and he'll think he has time to play. However, I also think that, just as in the movies, stage directors will all be different and Jake may have had a fortunate first time. I hope is second - whenever that may be - will also be fortunate. This is a fascinating subject. Thanks, pia :)

Anonymous said...

How exciting, WDW! I was so happy to read this, and I've meant to mention before that it was wonderful to hear that Jake's London stage debut got not only good reviews, but real acclaim, predicting that he would be "a talented young star of the future" then. He's a talent, for sure. Here's hoping the whispers are true, and looking forward to hearing more about Jake in Farragut North. :)

Anonymous said...

Hi Pia...I am all for any collection that will get me to N.Y. to see Jake!! Too bad we are all so widely scattered...carpooling to th Big Apple for a Broadway show...and with Jake to boot...I only have two words..."Road Trip". Michele

Anonymous said...

HI WDW...I am having a good week..and I hope you are as well...I always have a good week when you have posted something yummy and thought provoking on your site....Michele

Wet Dark and Wild said...

Hey Marina - let's keep our fingers crossed. It's so encouraging to read these old great reviews and know that Jake will be even better on stage now.

Thanks Michele - I love this image of a road trip to Broadway - it kind of conjures up pictures of Bubble Boy :D

Anonymous said...

"I did five films last year," he [Jake]says, looking bemused. "It was fine, except the power is not in your hands in terms of how your performance is shaped. To be able to have some sort of say over a story was really the big thing that made me want to try theatre."

WDW, not to worry, from the sound of this, if Jake isn't the full helmsman, he'd like to spend some time at the wheel, at any rate! ;)

Anonymous said...

I have mixed emotions about the possibility of Jake doing Broadway - regardless of what play it is. Even though there is no question that he would be magnificent and I would plan a trip immediately, hoping I would get to see him several times while I was in New York. It's all of the times that I would NOT be there as he continued his run that I don't like. I know I am being selfish and I'm sorry. But at least with his films we all have an equal opportunity to see them as many times as we want and to eventually own them as part of our collection. Once he finishes his obligated time to the play, that's it! And it can only live on in our memories.

That said, the unselfish side of me knows this would be another feather in Jake's cap. Another notch on his belt if he is so fortunate to work with yet one more master director. Thanks, Positively Pia, for the reminder that Mike Nichols directed Dustin way back when. Who went on to act with Jake. And now Jake may get his turn with Mike. I love these repeated connections in Jake's career that also includes John Carroll Lynch, Chris Cooper and Peter Sarsgaard. There are probably others that I have not noticed.

Anyway, I hope Diane Sawyer's fangirl reaction to Jake's charms has more than a little influence on her husband's decision to work with Jake - going along with his practical sense in knowing what a fine actor he would be collaborating with.

Just want to thank you, WDW, for all of the incredible hard work you put into your choice of topics each day. I know that 99% of us here appreciate more than we can say that this is a top notch site. Now, I will speak only for myself when I say that I feel extremely passionate about Jake and everything there is to know about him. But you have taken your passion to the next level and have dedicated countless hours to present the most positive image of a very worthy subject. The good vibes are so strong at WDW that any negativity that tries to creep in doesn't stand a chance. What you do is no easy task and if just anyone could do it, they would!

Anonymous said...

Seems to me there is a huge difference in film and stage performances. The editor has so much to do with "shaping" (Jake's word) a film performance, certainly affecting pacing among other things. A play belongs to the director until opening night -- then it belongs to the actors. At least that is what I was always told in my VERY amateur days on the stage a kagillion years ago. Not so with film, methinks.

Anonymous said...

Dani: ... you have taken your passion to the next level and have dedicated countless hours to present the most positive image of a very worthy subject. The good vibes are so strong at WDW that any negativity that tries to creep in doesn't stand a chance.

Exactly!

Anonymous said...

I love your blog!!! I think if I have to hock some jewelry, I'm going to figure out a way to get to Manhattan for this play...if Jake is involved. WDW you've exposed my to so many wonderful new British expressions. Excuse me now whilst I go furtle around. How cool is that!!!

Anonymous said...

"you have taken your passion to the next level and have dedicated countless hours to present the most positive image of a very worthy subject. The good vibes are so strong at WDW that any negativity that tries to creep in doesn't stand a chance."

I just have to chip in and say HOW MUCH I AGREE with that!!!


WDW this is another flyby as I'm quite exhausted after celebrating India's Birthday yesterday into the wee hours. Greetings from India to all WDW-ers.

"This is the sign I know I will see when Jake is truly in love again"

Cherita that brought back a cherished memory of bygone days

Wet Dark and Wild said...

Good morning everyone! And the sun's out. Thanks for your comments overnight (and the kind words *)) and I'll be back to chat later :D

Anonymous said...

....who came over a little peculiar and light headed when she interviewed Jake as part of the Zodiac promotion in the Spring. She mentioned that Jake's SNL performance had had quite an effect on her - didn't she say that she fell out of bed?

Wasn't there a general concensus over at DC Eyelashes thread that Diane Sawyer is a secret 'Lasher?

Anonymous said...

:)

To be a little unnecessary around Jake is just normal. To be a Lasher requires ... something else.

Anonymous said...

Touche!!!!!!

Mike Nichols may well have had a practical demonstration of the appeal of his potential leading man.

Ruby said...

To be a Lasher requires ... something else.

LOL! Now that is a comment open to interpretation! ;D


A play belongs to the director until opening night -- then it belongs to the actors.

Thanks beckela, that's how I see it too. An actor would be in control of their performance every night, maybe trying different things. Whilst s/he can also do that with different takes of a movie scene, the director/editor gets to decide which of those takes to use in the final cut - which might not be the actor's own preference. I remember Ang Lee saying that Jake used to try out different things for Jack Twist.

Count me in for a transatlantic road trip. I'll carry WDW's notebook for her backstage interview with Jake! :D

Ruby said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ruby said...

A few further thoughts....

all the other technical things around a movie scene also make a difference to the actor's performance as the viewer sees it. If you have ever watched a 'making of' documentary that shows an actor being filmed doing a scene, it often looks quite 'raw'. The scene always looks very different in the finished product - because of media, camera angle,lighting, sound, special effects, etc. With a play you just have the 'raw' version, if you see what I mean. Much more of the actor and less of everything else.

Or maybe it's the nature of theatre culture. That the actor gets to input more. Didn't Jake once say that what he liked about British theatre was that the actor was paramount?

As you can tell this has got me musing. :) Of course I have no idea what I am talking about really.

Wet Dark and Wild said...

Hey Ruby! I'm not really here but I'm definitely listening! This is very interesting. You carry on and I'll be able to chat later :D

Anonymous said...

I can so see all of us on a hired Lear Jet off to NY.

Anonymous said...

What a great read WDW!! Thank you again for putting another touch on this masterpiece of a blog!

I knew I had another connection to Jake!! If I born a boy, my parents were going to name me WARREN!! I love all Warrens now, and knowing Jake played a Warren makes me smile!! (My Mother was really into Warren Beaty at the time she was pregnant with me :) )

Anyway, the thought of Jake on stage gives me goosebumps too. I would immediately plan a trip so that I could witness his perfection in person! I'll chip in for the Lear Jet...although it must make a stop in Tulsa and pick me up!!
Thanks again WDW, you have made another ghastly hot day in OK much more bearable!!

KeepCalm+CarryOn said...

Hi WDW and friends. I apologise if this comes out garbled because I'm typing against the clock, as per usual! :-(
I loved this post, WDW, not least because it filled in a few gaps for me re Jake's London theatre debut, back in the wilderness years when I had no idea that the dear boy even existed! How right were the critics to ear-mark him for future greatness on the basis of a pretty universally acclaimed performance in TIOY. The photos were great too, especially the ones of him pootling around Notting Hill on his bike or carrying Kirsten's handbag (my husband is suitably accommodating as a sherpa on shopping trips etc and I find it another endearing quality in Jake that he has no problem with toting a "purse").
I have to confess a selfish motive for wanting Jake to perform at the RSC in Stratford should he ever decide to tread the boards over here again in the future. I haven't been to London in 19 years, Birmingham either for that matter - I don't "do" big cities these days and New York for "Farragut North" should it come to fruition? Might as well be Mars! But the Royal Shakespeare Theatre, next to the River Avon in an historic old town - now that's much more my cup of tea.
However,as my thought transference is a little rusty,it may take a while before Jake responds to a wierd urge to hie to central England and pull on doublet and hose! Therefore I'll be happy for those who get there if he does play Broadway,though positively nauseous with envy,and in the meanwhile hope that, once rested over the Summer,he finds himself embroiled in another enjoyable and fulfilling film project for us ALL to enjoy/admire/salivate over!
I agree with Ruby that it's not just the director,but the editor and cinematographer too who determine the final shape of the film and recall Jake's stated preference for a collaborative relationship with a director, although some have been more willing than others to afford him that opportunity. Perhaps it won't just be theatre he looks to in order to exercise some control over character/story in the future - he might take over the director's role himself given time and experience and, fortunately, this doesn't preclude him from acting in his own films too.
I too felt a pang of sympathy for him, WDW, when he expressed thoughts that the love scene with Jen A in "The Good Girl" may have looked awkward. Apparently they had to remove some of the "modesty padding" from between her legs before they finally got it right because it was too bulky at first and it looked like the poor love was humping her knees(though some of us would settle for that;-) ).
Far from being awkward, I thought that love scene was truly touching, in fact Jake's portrayal of "Holden" was so vulnerable, lost and needful, a damaged soul, I found it heart-breaking. The very way he said her name "Justine" was so full of love and longing it made me ache!
To end on a more positive note, how lovely that Jake obviously had the maturity to realise, even as a very young man, that he was a very fortunate individual in many ways and could look back on his youth with few regrets. I sincerely hope his whole life can be similarly happy and free from too many "if only's"!
Oh and WDW, please don't let negative comments,unnecessary and spiteful as they might seem, throw you off course or play on your mind. You are doing a fabulous job for which your devoted "regulars" are very grateful!!

Wet Dark and Wild said...

Phew - made it home at last. Thnks so much for your comments today. So Anouska if you can organise that Lear Jet for our Broadway outing I'd be grateful ;)

Dani Thanks for your great comment. I understand what you mean about Jake being in the play as he does elicit some complicated feelings. For myself, I think I'll focus on those times when maybe we could see him and, as you say, it really would be a feathr in his cap. Thanks so much for the kind words too :)

Thank you so much Beckela, Bobbyanna and Incognita :D, I hope the India celebrations went well!

A play belongs to the director until opening night -- then it belongs to the actors. - this is so interesting Beckela and I agree entirely. When all the rehearsals are done and over, you're left with an actor on the stage in front of his audience and it's intimate. There has to be ome kind of experimentation going on - the director trusts his actor but the actor is being let loose in a sense.

As you say Ruby - the director of a film does get the final choice in which frame or take to go with. And the acting is only one part of that scene, as you say. The ciematography is vital.

Anon and Anouska - loved your exchange! To be a little unnecessary around Jake is just normal. To be a Lasher requires ... something else. - perfectly put, Anouska :D

Hi Valentine! - That's funny about Warrens ;D I would have been an Edward... I can't wait for Rendition but I find something a little off about Jake playing a Douglas, don't know why but I do. How he suited the name Jack, and Donnie.

Hey Nadine - I'm glad you liked the pictures of Jake tootling around Notting Hill and London. I went through there again today and I was thinking of Jake :D I think a good boyfriend has to accept his load bearing duties, and Jake does have the muscles for it after all. I do hope that Jake fulfils your wish to see him on the stage in England again. I can just see him in that doublet and hose or - if in Antony and Cleopatra - a short tunic ;D

That's so touching about The Good Girl but it seems to have produced a real lasting friendship for Jake and Jen. Jake's very lucky to have so few regrets and, as you say, long may that continue. He's made chices and, as far as we can see, they've worked. Thanks Nadine *)

Anonymous said...

Fall of '08 -

WDW, the Vineyard's "season", at least in the past, has gone from July 1 through labor day - unlike "the Hamptons" that boogie all year round. So off-season is good - June or September. Wintertime? Nevermind. Everybody's drinking the winter away.

Wet Dark and Wild said...

Everybody's drinking the winter away - sounds good to me Positively pia - count me in :D